Gopher Menu

       ----------------------------------------
       WebP sucks.
       April 10th, 2019
       ----------------------------------------
       
       Am I think only person who thinks that Google's new image format, WebP is
       a solution in search of a problem? I have downloaded their tools and
       tried to convert many PNGs to WebP and also have taken some RAWs and 
       converted them to JPEG, JPEG2000 (JP2), and WebP... In nearly every one 
       of my tests the WebP images were either larger or more blurry than the 
       competitors (or both in the case of JP2)... Don't even get me started on
       WebM.
       ----------------------------------------
 (DIR) Back to phlog index
 (DIR) gopher.zcrayfish.soy gopher root
       This phlog entry has been read 382 times.
  (?)  Comments have been enabled for this post, select here to leave yours
       Comments have been left on this post:
       
       The thing is webp is efficient at making filesizes really low, while
       making quality less painful than jpeg artifacts. Imho it is a tradeoff
       of lossy image formats. - lich (gopher://dataswamp.org/1/~lich)
       Posted Wed 10 Apr 12:59:10 UTC 2019 by 185.220.100.252
       ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       I had no idea it was a thing until now. I'll check it out.
       Posted Tue 16 Apr 11:51:59 UTC 2019 by 173.244.44.100
       ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Webp and webm can go die in a fire. JPGs and GIFs are the way to go.
       Posted Sun Aug 25 03:52:20 UTC 2019 by 
       2601:4c2:4201:cffd:4d51:2874:348a:5e37
       ------------------------------------------------------------------------